I Went Looking for TikTok Ads Manager and Found X Ads Manager Instead
I was on my phone trying to log in to TikTok Ads Manager. I needed one quick number. That was it. I searched “TikTok Ads Manager” on Google, tapped search, and there it was: an ad for X Ads Manager. Right there, sitting at the top of a search for a direct competitor, waiting for someone exactly like me to be in exactly that moment of intent. I laughed, then thought, Oh, that’s cheeky. I see what you’re doing.
And then, because I am apparently incapable of experiencing advertising like a normal person, I started thinking about the strategy behind it. X was essentially inserting itself into a high-intent search for a competitor’s product. Someone searching for TikTok Ads Manager is probably not casually browsing. They are trying to advertise, manage campaigns, check performance, or get into an ad platform. In other words: they already have the problem. X just wants to be considered the solution.
Google allows advertisers to bid on trademarked terms as keywords. The important distinction is that the trademark itself is not automatically protected from being used as a keyword; restrictions kick in around how the trademark is used in the ad, particularly when a direct competitor uses it in a way Google considers confusing, deceptive, or misleading.
Which creates an interesting creative brief. You can target the search for “TikTok Ads Manager.” But you have to be much more careful about what you actually say in the ad. You can’t simply write something like:
“Tired of TikTok Ads? Switch to X.”
That starts wandering into trademark-policy and misleading-ad territory. Instead, you have to sell the alternative without necessarily making the competitor the headline. That constraint makes the creative problem more interesting. Because now the brief becomes something like: You know what they came looking for. Give them a reason to reconsider. That is a much more sophisticated proposition than simply shouting, “We’re better!”
X’s advertising proposition is built around reaching people while they’re researching, comparing and deciding, with targeting options that include keywords, followers, location and conversation signals. So this particular placement feels very on- brand. Someone is already in advertising mode. X doesn’t have to convince them that advertising exists. It just has to squeeze itself into the consideration set. Which I think is a genuinely good tactic. Not because someone searching for TikTok Ads Manager will automatically abandon TikTok. They probably won’t. I certainly didn’t. But advertising doesn’t always have to produce an immediate conversion to be useful. Sometimes the win is simply getting the competitor’s name into someone’s head at precisely the moment they’re thinking about the category.
Compare that to most display advertising, where you're interrupting someone who had no intention of thinking about you at all. Competitor keyword traffic arrives warm. They know what the category is. They've already made the cognitive leap of deciding to use something like what you offer; they just chose someone else first. Your job is to make them pause long enough to reconsider. I went to Google looking for TikTok. I left thinking about X - which inspired this blog - and that’s not nothing.
Your competitor is buying your keywords. Should you? This is more nuanced. Competitor keywords tend to cost more than non-branded terms, because you're in an auction with brands that have a strong incentive to protect their own traffic. And conversion rates can be lower, because you're catching people mid-intent on someone else rather than people actively seeking you out. At scale, it makes obvious sense. If you're a large brand trying to steal market share, bidding on a competitor's name is a fairly efficient way to reach a pre-qualified audience. At smaller budgets, the calculation is tighter. You're paying a premium to intercept traffic that was headed somewhere else, and the message has to work harder to justify the switch. So I wouldn’t say spend heavily on this tactic. I’d test it before I bet the farm on it.
Search intent is the whole game in paid search. Someone typing a competitor's product name is telling you exactly where they are in the funnel. This can be valuable because the audience is already signalling a need, and you've shown up in that moment. But intent doesn’t automatically mean openness to switching. Someone searching specifically for TikTok Ads Manager may be deeply committed to TikTok’s ecosystem, have campaigns running there, or need to check one metric. The job, then, isn’t just to intercept the search. It’s to give the person a compelling enough reason to pause. And X did manage that part with me. Maybe not enough to make me click or abandon the number I was looking for, but enough that I thought about the ad for the rest of the day. Which brings me back to where I started. I was looking for TikTok Ads
Manager, but I saw X Ads Manager first. I didn’t convert. But I thought about it for the rest of the day, which is more than most ads can say. And, as a marketer, I have to admit: that’s a pretty good ad.
Where I’ve been I’ve been thinking a lot more about paid media lately, especially about the points where paid and organic stop being completely separate.
Good advertising is often less about the ad itself and more about understanding intent. What is someone looking for? What do they already believe? And what can you put in front of them at exactly the right moment?
The interesting parts in all these are the tiny decisions behind campaigns that most people never see: the targeting choice, the audience assumption, the slightly odd keyword someone decided to bid on. Sometimes, that’s where the best marketing lessons are hiding.
Field Notes
New notes land here when I have something worth sending.